My Lords, I listened carefully to what the noble Lord, Lord Jenkin, said. I remember that occasion well, given my interests at the time and the continuing interest which I declared on a previous occasion. As I said, we do not seek to oppose the injection of private capital. Interestingly, there was almost unanimous support for the 2009 Bill, which applied the same formula that I applied to the House today. I hear the points made by the Minister on private sector investment but it is not quite true that it said ““100 per cent privatisation”” in either the coalition agreement or Liberal Democrat manifesto; I noticed that those were not the words that she used. I stick by my original assertion that this is new territory. It is an important and fundamental decision and one on which we should test the opinion of the House.
Division on Amendment 2
Contents 165; Not-Contents 218.
Amendment 2 disagreed.
Clause 2 : Report on decision to dispose of shares in a Royal Mail company etc
Amendment 3
Moved by
Postal Services Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Young of Norwood Green
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 4 May 2011.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Postal Services Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
727 c478 Session
2010-12Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 15:55:41 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_738018
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_738018
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_738018