UK Parliament / Open data

European Union Bill

Proceeding contribution from David Lidington (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 8 March 2011. It occurred during Debate on bills on European Union Bill.
If my hon. Friend will forgive me, I want to reply to my hon. Friend the Member for Daventry. Another example of the lack of flexibility in new clause 4 relates to the variation in payments from year to year. The December letter left some scope for real variation in payments over the next financial perspective, provided that payments over the whole period were frozen in real terms. The new clause would prevent any payments variations, but such variations are a natural consequence of how the financial framework works. For example, a commitment of 100 euros in 2005 might lead to a payment of 20 euros in 2006 and 80 euros in 2007. That is because commitments made in one year do not translate into uniform payments over subsequent years. We want to cut wasteful EU spending, not just to reduce the overall size of the EU budget, but to free up some resources to improve the value for money that we and other member states get from European Union spending, and to support activities such as boosting economic growth and competitiveness. We would like to see work done on improving the way in which the EU budget supports economic growth and competitiveness via the Europe 2020 strategy, subject to judicious selection of the most appropriate policy instruments. We want the EU budget to enhance security, via an active role for the EU as a global player. This could mean increases in spending under those headings, but we would insist on those being counterbalanced by reductions under other headings, all within our overall objective of restricting any increase in the EU budget to inflation. Paradoxically, the new clause might force a referendum on the next financial framework exactly because we had successfully achieved our reform agenda within the constraints of a very tight limit on the size of the budget overall. New clause 4 and the associated amendment 7 would hamper our objectives of driving down the overall EU budget and improving the value for money that it provides. I therefore urge my hon. Friends to withdraw those amendments. New clause 5 is about taxes. The measures proposed in the new clause address matters that already fall within European Union competence.

About this proceeding contribution

Reference

524 c844 

Session

2010-12

Chamber / Committee

House of Commons chamber
Back to top