UK Parliament / Open data

Superannuation Bill

Proceeding contribution from Lord Maude of Horsham (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 13 October 2010. It occurred during Debate on bills on Superannuation Bill.
Yes, indeed. If the result of the process that we have been through with the Bill is that it makes a negotiated settlement more likely, that will be extremely beneficial. I do not want the outcome of all this to be that the existing scheme remains in place with the crude caps that the Bill imports. What we want is a new, successor scheme, and there is now a serious prospect of that being achieved. If it can be achieved with the support and agreement of all six civil service unions, no one will be more delighted than I. However, if we have to go down the path of having a new scheme that is supported by fewer unions, that would still be better because it would mean that many of the concerns that have been raised would be met better than by the Bill. That would be infinitely better than the current scheme remaining in place, as it is simply unaffordable and unsustainable, as the previous Government openly accepted.

About this proceeding contribution

Reference

516 c343 

Session

2010-12

Chamber / Committee

House of Commons chamber
Back to top