I was taken aback by the point that the Minister made about the services directive. I was a Member of the European Parliament when that went through, and we had hours of debate on it. It is one of the bizarre European examples of the law of unforeseen consequences that it should have some bearing on what local authorities do when it comes to allowing pedlars to trade on their streets. When the European Scrutiny Committee looked at the services directive—it wrote a long report on it—did it consider that point? What other unforeseen consequences might flow from that directive?
Canterbury City Council Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Chris Heaton-Harris
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Monday, 5 July 2010.
It occurred during Legislative debate on Canterbury City Council Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
513 c134 Session
2010-12Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 17:27:03 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_651999
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_651999
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_651999