My Lords, I take this opportunity to set the record straight. Clauses 54 and 55 are important clauses on expulsion, and we wholly support them. We urged the Government to bring them forward but, quite rightly, they took the view that it was not possible for them to be passed today without a great deal of discussion and that that would imperil the whole of the Bill.
I spoke about the rest of the Bill earlier today and I am not going to repeat the points that I made. However, the charges made by the noble Lord, Lord McNally, are completely empty and actually faintly shocking. After the noble Lord pleaded to be part of the discussions and the Government invited him in, in good faith, I find the sort of language that we have heard tonight disappointing from the leader of a political party in this House. I support the Government.
Division on Clause 53
Contents 42; Not-Contents 98.
Clause 53 disagreed.
Amendment 30 not moved.
Clause 54 : Removal of members of the House of Lords etc
Clause 54 : Removal of members of the House of Lords etc
Amendment 31 not moved.
Amendment 32
Moved by
Constitutional Reform and Governance Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Strathclyde
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 7 April 2010.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Constitutional Reform and Governance Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
718 c1632 Session
2009-10Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 21:05:39 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_636747
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_636747
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_636747