On a point of order, Mr. Deputy Speaker. The debate that we have just had finished very early. Some of us felt strongly that new clause 52 should have been put to a vote, but we were told very clearly that when the Government new clauses were put to the Committee and accepted, that would be prevented. That would have made some sense if we had had no time in which to vote, but there was plenty of time. May we have a ruling from you, Mr. Deputy Speaker, on why the procedure was dealt with in that way?
Constitutional Reform and Governance Bill
Proceeding contribution from
David Drew
(Labour)
in the House of Commons on Monday, 1 February 2010.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee of the Whole House (HC) on Constitutional Reform and Governance Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
505 c132 Session
2009-10Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberRelated items
Constitutional Reform and Governance Bill
Monday, 1 February 2010
Proceeding contributions
House of Commons
Monday, 1 February 2010
Proceeding contributions
House of Commons
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 19:46:32 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_617811
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_617811
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_617811