The hon. Member for Ellesmere Port and Neston (Andrew Miller) did not read out paragraph (1)(3) of new schedule 9, which states:""The IPSA may, after consulting the Minister for the Civil Service… remove a trustee of the fund"."
It then refers to paragraph (3), of which sub-paragraph (4) states:""No provision of a scheme under this paragraph is to be construed as restricting the powers of the trustees under paragraph 2(1).""
Now is not the time to become discursive about what that may or may not mean, but I know of no pension scheme, outside the civil service, where the Minister for the civil service can be the only person who comments on a proposal to dismiss one or all trustees. I am therefore grateful to the Justice Secretary for saying that he will think more about the matter.
Constitutional Reform and Governance Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Peter Bottomley
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Monday, 1 February 2010.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee of the Whole House (HC) on Constitutional Reform and Governance Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
505 c57 Session
2009-10Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 19:45:00 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_617692
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_617692
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_617692