UK Parliament / Open data

Bournemouth Borough Council Bill [Lords]

No, it definitely should not. We spoke earlier of derogations. Fortunately, we still have the freedom in this country to refer to miles as a standard method of measurement of distance in relation to roads. We do not have to go to the metric mile, which is why I have proposed 1 mile. I hope that that is clear. There is a very different situation in Manchester compared—[Interruption.] Is my hon. Friend the Member for Bournemouth, East making a sedentary comment about four minutes? Does he wish to intervene, or is he threatening me by saying he is going to move a closure motion in four minutes? [Interruption.] I see: he is talking about the four-minute mile. It is very difficult to concentrate when there are sedentary interruptions—[Interruption]—but my hon. Friend is continuing to make them. It would be sensible to do the same in Manchester as in Bournemouth, because on the evidence put forward by the city council, that is where the problem lies. The area would be clearly defined and it is, after all, important that the law should be clear. I also contend that these provisions should only be in force when necessary. When I had my initial discussions with Bournemouth council about amendments to the Bill, I made the point that as the problem does not arise 12 months of the year, but only in the summer and around Christmas, it would be sensible to limit the ambit of the Bill to those times.

About this proceeding contribution

Reference

504 c514-5 

Session

2009-10

Chamber / Committee

House of Commons chamber
Back to top