UK Parliament / Open data

Canterbury City Council Bill

Is it not even worse than that, because, in order to get compensation, someone would have to establish that the person who had seized the goods did not have a reasonable suspicion that an offence was being committed? Case law shows that the test of reasonable suspicion is less than that required to establish a prima facie case.

About this proceeding contribution

Reference

503 c927 

Session

2009-10

Chamber / Committee

House of Commons chamber
Back to top