UK Parliament / Open data

Canterbury City Council Bill

Proceeding contribution from Philip Davies (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 14 January 2010. It occurred during Debate on bills on Canterbury City Council Bill.
My hon. Friend may or may not be right about that. I am not particularly well up on the procurement activities of the diplomatic service when it comes to tickets for events. He may know more than I do. I am making the case that ticket touting and a secondary market in tickets are in the best interests of consumers on both sides of the fence. Other people may take a different view, but I am passionately against the Bills because they drive a coach and horses through the principle of ticket touting. A more general point is that whatever people's view about the desirability or otherwise of ticket touting and selling, it would sure be nonsensical to have a different law relating to Nottingham from those that apply in any other part of the country. It would bring laws passed in this House into utter contempt if, after the House had expressed an opinion on whether something was a good thing that acted in the interests of consumers, one particular city decided to do something completely different on a matter of national importance.

About this proceeding contribution

Reference

503 c924 

Session

2009-10

Chamber / Committee

House of Commons chamber
Back to top