My hon. Friend is correct. However, this is the first opportunity that Members have had to comment on the Committee's deliberations, with whose conclusions I disagree. It is clear that the representative of the promoters even had doubts. He rightly said that the amendments agreed by Reading and Leeds do not affect pedlars' human rights, because they allow them to continue trading door to door, but he had clear reservations about the Canterbury and Nottingham Bills.
Canterbury City Council Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Peter Bone
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Thursday, 14 January 2010.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Canterbury City Council Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
503 c910 Session
2009-10Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-11 10:04:58 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_609382
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_609382
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_609382