UK Parliament / Open data

Canterbury City Council Bill

Proceeding contribution from Peter Bone (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 14 January 2010. It occurred during Debate on bills on Canterbury City Council Bill.
My hon. Friend is correct. However, this is the first opportunity that Members have had to comment on the Committee's deliberations, with whose conclusions I disagree. It is clear that the representative of the promoters even had doubts. He rightly said that the amendments agreed by Reading and Leeds do not affect pedlars' human rights, because they allow them to continue trading door to door, but he had clear reservations about the Canterbury and Nottingham Bills.

About this proceeding contribution

Reference

503 c910 

Session

2009-10

Chamber / Committee

House of Commons chamber
Back to top