It was useful to have that debate on Clause 5, although we spent a large amount of time talking about Clause 8. I am glad that we have clarified that Clause 8(3) is going and that there is the strongest possibility that Clause 8(2) will be removed, so that we will be left with just Clause 8(1).
Other noble Lords who have spoken, including the noble Lord, Lord Lester of Herne Hill, have said that we are being asked to absorb a great many changes to the Bill from all the amendments that have been made. If we finish the Bill tonight—I have a feeling that we will not—it could be reprinted tomorrow, but if we continue Committee for, say, a couple of hours on Thursday, it will not be reprinted until Friday. I wonder—I have no idea of the answer—whether there is any way in which there could be some sort of interim publication to deal with all the amendments that we have already had to help us when we get to Report on Monday. The alternative is that Report on Monday may end up being a recommitment of the Bill; I am not sure that the Government would be very keen on that at all.
Parliamentary Standards Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Strathclyde
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 14 July 2009.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Parliamentary Standards Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
712 c1142 Session
2008-09Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 12:51:09 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_577549
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_577549
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_577549