I support the noble Baroness’s wording of "from time to time". The words as they currently are in the Bill will set up an expectation which might be seized upon by Members of the other House in points of order to the Speaker requiring changes. "From time to time" more accurately reflects what will be the case. On the issue of members of the family, I refer the noble Baroness, Lady Hamwee, to Category 9 in the code of conduct for Members of Parliament, where, under "Shareholdings", it refers to: ""Interests in shareholdings held by the Member, either personally, or with or on behalf of the Member’s spouse or partner or dependent children, in any public or private company"."
That has generally been the definition of "family" over a number of years as far as the House of Commons Committee on Standards and Privileges has been concerned.
Parliamentary Standards Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Campbell-Savours
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 14 July 2009.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Parliamentary Standards Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
712 c1109 Session
2008-09Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 12:47:32 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_577498
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_577498
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_577498