I am delighted that the hon. Lady is getting so worked up. I merely remind her that in both Australia and the United States—the United States example is particularly relevant—intercept evidence is already admissible in court. If she spent any time talking to serious investigators of both terrorism and organised crime in the United States, she would find that they think it astonishing that we are not prepared to avail ourselves of a fundamental tool for the bringing of successful prosecutions.
Let me also remind the hon. Lady that the reason it is so important for us to think about the United States is that we have such a close intelligence relationship with it. I suggest that if the United States can use intercept evidence without blowing a hole in the abilities of its security and secret services, we too should be able to do so. As the hon. Lady knows very well, this issue has been dragging on for ages.
Prevention and Suppression of Terrorism
Proceeding contribution from
Chris Huhne
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Commons on Thursday, 9 July 2009.
It occurred during Legislative debate on Prevention and Suppression of Terrorism.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
495 c1171 Session
2008-09Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 12:45:45 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_576429
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_576429
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_576429