That is not sufficient to mollify me, because I am not talking about individual cases, I am talking about the principle. I have already enunciated the three principles laid down by previous Ministers that have now been reneged on. We can talk about individual cases until we are blue in the face, and there has been masses of correspondence. It is not necessary for us to sit around a table to talk about that. I will do that if it will convince the noble Lord that what we are saying is correct, but we want to eliminate the problem of statelessness among the original BNOs who did not manage to get the full citizenship to which they were entitled and which they had been promised by successive Governments.
We want not just consideration of individual cases but a reaffirmation of the promises made by successive Governments now being reneged on by this one. I have no alternative but to withdraw the amendment, but I do so with great reluctance.
Amendment 90 withdrawn.
Borders, Citizenship and Immigration Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Avebury
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 2 March 2009.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Borders, Citizenship and Immigration Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
708 c605 Session
2008-09Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 09:43:21 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_533148
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_533148
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_533148