As I understand it, the proposed new subsection that is being introduced deals with persons who are not settled in the United Kingdom but who become members of the Armed Forces. I hope the Committee will forgive me if I consider the Minister’s reply in Hansard in some detail to see whether we shall return to it. I am most grateful to the noble and learned Baroness for her support on this; like her, I am puzzled by the purpose of these provisions. If it is indeed the intention, as the Minister said, that they should be brought in before the end of this year, why would the Government resist? Why would they need the provision, ""on or after the relevant day","
in Clause 40(4), which is the subject matter of Amendment 86, at all? If the Minister will forgive me, I will take this away and read at leisure what he said. Perhaps the Minister would like to add something.
Borders, Citizenship and Immigration Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Thomas of Gresford
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 2 March 2009.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Borders, Citizenship and Immigration Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
708 c596-7 Session
2008-09Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 09:42:20 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_533134
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_533134
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_533134