I am grateful to the hon. Gentleman. His answer to my question might mean that I will not need to make a further contribution to the debate on this group of amendments. One possible effect of the hon. Gentleman’s amendment is that it might be used to exclude small friendly savings providers, such as credit unions, as they do not have the wider access to other banking services that the amendment seems to require. It might also prevent the Government from targeting these accounts through Post Office Counters—something that might help to keep some of the post offices in all our constituencies open. I hope that that is not the intention, but will the hon. Gentleman confirm that it is simply a probing amendment and that he does not intend to limit these accounts to the big banks. If that is his intention, I will certainly want to vote against it.
Saving Gateway Accounts Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Stephen Ladyman
(Labour)
in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 25 February 2009.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Saving Gateway Accounts Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
488 c300 Session
2008-09Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 09:53:57 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_531483
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_531483
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_531483