In that case, one could argue that it is good for Governments to come to Parliament if they want to change one of the founding principles of the NHS. That is a positive thing to allow for. I was a little surprised that there was not a greater degree of concern about Parliament having been completely sidelined in this context but I shall of course reflect on all the contributions made. The Minister said that in practice there was no difference between the principles in the NHS Plan and those in the constitution, and I shall reflect on that as well. I observe only that at least one principle in the NHS Plan has become a pledge in the constitution and is therefore not enforceable. Therefore, I think that there is a difference between the two and we may be able to find other examples.
I believe this is a debate that we had to have. In the light of comments that have been made, between now and the next stage I shall consider carefully what to do about this particular amendment but, in the mean time, I am happy to beg leave to withdraw it.
Amendment 3 withdrawn.
Health Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Earl Howe
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 23 February 2009.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Health Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
708 c18GC Session
2008-09Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 01:49:31 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_530533
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_530533
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_530533