UK Parliament / Open data

Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Bill [HL]

I cannot resist commenting that if there were less detail in the Bill it would not be necessary to spell out quite so much in this clause. If ““guidance””, which should have only its natural meaning, includes a model petition scheme, it ought not to be necessary to say that a local authority may or may not adopt the model because it is only there as part of the guidance. One would not then need to go into powers of intervention. I understand better the Minister’s point that the Government want to be sure that authorities, in setting up their schemes, which we continue to believe should be of their own design, do not set the threshold at some absurd number—more than 1,000 people or whatever—that would turn it into a petition to which they would need to respond in some way. I continue to feel that the politics of the situation will prompt local authorities, but that is part of the larger debate. I am grateful for the Minister’s response. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment 131 withdrawn. Amendment 132 not moved. Clause 19 agreed.

About this proceeding contribution

Reference

707 c135-6GC 

Session

2008-09

Chamber / Committee

House of Lords Grand Committee
Back to top