I support the amendments. The noble Lord, Lord Greaves, has highlighted the problems in two-tier authorities and, as the leader of a county council, obviously I recognise them. One tries to work with one’s district colleagues to resolve them.
I am more concerne, however, with what could be called necessarily partner authorities, such as PCTs and so on. But there are also bodies over which local government should have some control; for example, Network Rail. We talked about anecdotal evidence; I have a problem in Frinton, a nice little town on the Essex coast. The town’s gates close it off from the rest of the world—Frinton used not to have a pub. The residents love the gates; however, for safety reasons, Network Rail wants to change them; therefore there has been a big petition. The county council is, of course, the highway authority; but Network Rail has a statutory power to change things and, as leader of the county council, I am getting the blame for it. I have received many e-mails and so on.
There needs to be clarity because, although we received the petition, it was Network Rail’s decision in the end. I am sorry to add to the complications but we need to think through how one can deal with these matters effectively.
Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Hanningfield
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 28 January 2009.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
707 c86-7GC Session
2008-09Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 02:25:58 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_523736
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_523736
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_523736