moved Amendments Nos. 38 and 39:
38: Clause 11, page 6, line 2, after ““that”” insert ““the condition in subsection (1A) or (1B) is met.
(1A) The condition is that—””
39: Clause 11, page 6, line 9, at end insert—
““(1B) The condition is that—
(a) since the time when part of a national policy statement (““the relevant part””) was first published or (if later) last reviewed, there has been a significant change in any circumstances on the basis of which any of the policy set out in the relevant part was decided,
(b) the change was not anticipated at that time, and
(c) if the change had been anticipated at that time, any of the policy set out in the relevant part would have been materially different.””
On Question, amendments agreed to.
[Amendment No. 40 not moved.]
Planning Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Andrews
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 6 November 2008.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Planning Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
705 c428 Session
2007-08Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 22:58:14 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_506901
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_506901
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_506901