I, too, will study what the noble Baroness has said. She agreed with my points, which has led me to the conclusion that highways, to take one example, would be part of the original application, so I do not see that it is associated development. However, I think we can pursue this outside the Chamber if I am still getting it wrong. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.
Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.
[Amendment No. 338 not moved.]
Clause 111 agreed to.
Clause 112 [Reasons for decision to grant or refuse development consent]:
[Amendments Nos. 339 to 341 not moved.]
Clause 112 agreed to.
Clause 113 [Orders granting development consent: formalities]:
[Amendments Nos. 342 and 343 not moved.]
Planning Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Hamwee
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 20 October 2008.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Planning Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
704 c950 Session
2007-08Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-16 00:48:34 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_501652
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_501652
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_501652