I am not at all sure, given our behaviour on this Bill, that we are in a position to advise anybody on timetables. I am extremely grateful to the noble Baroness for the detail of her reply. Once again, all those who tabled amendments in this group—I had a very small part in the proceedings—will study what the noble Baroness said and what it means, in addition to the first impression we take away with us. When we have done that, we may want to pursue some of these matters further. For now, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.
Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.
[Amendments Nos. 295 to 299 not moved.]
Clause 100 agreed to.
Clause 101 [Decisions of Panel and Council]:
[Amendments Nos. 300 to 313A not moved.]
Clause 101 agreed to.
Clause 102 [Decisions of Secretary of State]:
[Amendments Nos. 314 to 317 not moved.]
Clause 102 agreed to.
Clause 103 agreed to.
Clause 104 [Timetable for decisions]:
[Amendments Nos. 318 and 326 not moved.]
Clause 104 agreed to.
Clause 105 [Suspension during review of national policy statement]:
Planning Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Dixon-Smith
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 16 October 2008.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Planning Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
704 c926-7 Session
2007-08Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-16 01:55:26 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_500950
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_500950
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_500950