had given notice of his intention to move Amendment No. 118:
118: Clause 14, page 8, line 2, leave out subsections (3) to (5)
The noble Lord said: I am going to duck out on this one. The noble Lord, Lord Hunt, in his response to the earlier amendments, gave us some reasons why mission creep might in certain instances be desirable. I need to think a little more about what exactly he said.
[Amendment No. 118 not moved.]
Planning Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Dixon-Smith
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 14 October 2008.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Planning Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
704 c702Session
2007-08Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 23:19:11 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_499786
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_499786
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_499786