We have had a full discussion about major infrastructure projects in a limited number of fields: gas, carbon dioxide and thresholds for wind farms. My noble friend Lord Jenkin got into some nuclear waste amendments. We have other waste amendments to consider later that do not cover that issue but which would have been the point at which I raised the question of nuclear waste.
Finally, we had the debut of the noble Lord, Lord Hunt, on this subject. He has dealt with our and the Government’s amendments in great detail and we will have to study with immense care what he has said. I think that we have the answers that we want, although he raised a number of questions in his remarks that we will need to think about. However, he has been enormously helpful. We have certainly got explanations on the main points of our concern. For that, I am immensely grateful and I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.
Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.
Planning Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Dixon-Smith
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 14 October 2008.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Planning Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
704 c696-7 Session
2007-08Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 23:19:05 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_499776
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_499776
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_499776