I shall not reply at length to the question of the noble Lord, Lord Woolmer; I am quite happy to leave that to the Minister. However, I am delighted that my noble and learned friend Lord Mackay is directing his considerable intellect to this question. He may be able to help us on how best to devise a form of words that reflects what most people seem to want. There should be a process of regular review whenever necessary.
However, on the amendment—like the amendment of the noble Baroness, Lady Hamwee—if a review produces changes which do not materially affect the main thrust of the thing, there should not necessarily be the whole panoply of consultation and parliamentary consideration. As a result of this debate, I do not think the clause has it right now. However, perhaps we shall hear from the Minister; she may be able to reassure us.
Planning Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Jenkin of Roding
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 14 October 2008.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Planning Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
704 c632 Session
2007-08Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-16 01:48:11 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_499701
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_499701
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_499701