My Lords, I think the record will show that I said I did not accept that there was a public service obligation and that I did not think that the Government could establish it. Our position is that there should be no subsidy for personal accounts. Whatever language is used to reach that position does not much matter—it is a fairly basic position.
We have to leave it at that. As I said, this is not the way I would have liked to finish today’s proceedings but it is important that we make our initial view clear. We have not been persuaded. With that, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.
Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.
[Amendments Nos. 60 and 61 not moved.]
Clause 78 [Principles]:
[Amendments Nos. 62 and 63 not moved.]
Clause 80 [Finance]:
[Amendment No. 64 not moved.]
Pensions Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Noakes
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 7 October 2008.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Pensions Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
704 c225-6 Session
2007-08Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 23:45:22 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_497436
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_497436
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_497436