The problem with raising this at this stage is that, having dealt with the first group of amendments, we have effectively dealt with the question of whether the schedule should stand part of the Bill. In those circumstances, I do not intend to pursue the matter.
Schedule 1 agreed to.
Clause 2 [Code of conduct]:
[Amendments Nos. 22 to 24 not moved.]
Clause 2 agreed to.
Clause 3 [Register of Commissioners' interests]:
[Amendment No. 25 not moved.]
Clause 3 agreed to.
Clause 4 agreed to.
[Amendment No. 26 not moved.]
Clause 5 [National policy statements]:
Planning Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Dixon-Smith
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 6 October 2008.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Planning Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
704 c96Session
2007-08Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-16 00:23:16 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_497079
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_497079
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_497079