I am grateful for that answer. I was questioning why it was necessary to include ““vary”” in subsection (6)(a), although I did not express it in those terms. I have still not received a particularly clear answer, with or without the intervention of the noble Lord, Lord Oakeshott. However, that was only a tiny part of what I was after. It is clear that the suspension of a notice while it is being reviewed is in suspension, if I may put it that way. Over the summer the Government will consider how they intend to respond to the Constitution Committee’s suggestions and will come back with amendments on Report. I am extremely grateful for that and I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.
Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.
[Amendment No. 95 not moved.]
Clause 38 agreed to.
Clause 39 [References to the Pensions Regulator Tribunal]:
Pensions Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Skelmersdale
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 30 June 2008.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Pensions Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
703 c70 Session
2007-08Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-16 00:01:53 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_488211
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_488211
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_488211