We are getting a little clearer. I can well understand that the trustee, for example, who has given information to the employer who then acts on it might well be prosecutable in certain circumstances, but I fail to understand why, for example, a member of the employer’s HR department should have a compliance notice issued against him, as I would have thought that the employer was responsible for his employees. I do not want to take this any further because it is a rather abstruse argument. I shall read carefully what the noble Lord has tried to explain three times now, which is probably enough for the rest of the Committee.
On Question, amendment agreed to.
Pensions Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Skelmersdale
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 30 June 2008.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Pensions Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
703 c51-2 Session
2007-08Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-16 00:01:38 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_488160
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_488160
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_488160