The right hon. Gentleman objected. He wanted to say, ““Not charged””, and the difference is as follows. I went to see the police who ran that operation, and I talked to them about the three people who were released uncharged. I said to them, ““In that case, did you put them on control orders, where the level of proof is lower?”” They said, ““No.”” I asked, ““Did you put them under surveillance?”” They said, ““No.”” I asked, ““Have you got them under continuing investigation?”” They said, ““No.”” I asked, ““Are you telling me they are innocent?”” They said, ““Yes.”” The Home Secretary arranged for me to see those gentlemen and the man who ran Operation Overt. ““Innocent”” is the word, and the right hon. Gentleman will have to live with it, whether he likes it or not.
Counter-Terrorism Bill
Proceeding contribution from
David Davis
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 1 April 2008.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Counter-Terrorism Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
474 c667 Session
2007-08Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 23:49:03 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_460125
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_460125
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_460125