I do not know whether my hon. Friend will reach clause 10, which is entitled ““Tax consequences””, but does it worry him that the arrangements that it sets out constitute carte blanche, especially given the width of the orders,"““in connection with…or in consequence of””"
the transfer of property and so on, and the fact that the "““provision that may be made by the regulations includes provision for or in connection with…a tax provision not to apply””?"
In other words, clause 10 could lead to no tax being paid and total tax relief being given in all the circumstances that the provision outlines.
Banking (Special Provisions) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
William Cash
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 19 February 2008.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee of the Whole House (HC) on Banking (Special Provisions) Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
472 c184 Session
2007-08Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 22:56:27 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_446099
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_446099
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_446099