My Lords, I thank my noble friend for his response, in particular to Amendment No. 67. We await what emerges further on that.
On the issue of the operator of last resort I do not think that my noble friend responded to the point that there are those powers within London. Any local transport authority would have to decide about the costs involved in deciding whether to exercise those powers of operator of last resort. Obviously, the costs involved would depend on the extent to which it was going to decide to act as an operator of last resort in the exceptional circumstances in which that normally arises. In the light of the Minister's response, that option is not going to be available to the transport authority to consider even if it wished to do so. I note my noble friend's response with regret on Amendment No. 70, but I beg leave to withdraw Amendment No. 67.
Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.
[Amendments Nos. 68 to 70 not moved.]
Local Transport Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Rosser
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 16 January 2008.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Local Transport Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
697 c1353 Session
2007-08Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-16 00:02:19 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_435113
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_435113
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_435113