I support this amendment because I am concerned that Clause 31(1)(b) simply says, "““who is convicted in the United Kingdom of an offence””."
I suspect that that is going too wide. I am slightly surprised at the moderation of the noble Lord, Lord Avebury, in wanting to put in only two years; I think a case could be made out for putting in five years. I very recently came across a case of an asylum seeker who had made the mistake of taking a job in this country, no doubt completely out of ignorance. For that he was convicted and served a prison sentence—I am not sure how long—and was then detained presumably in preparation for deportation. The commission of technical offences should not be a kind of fast-track to deportation. I hope that the Government will have second thoughts about this.
UK Borders Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Hylton
(Crossbench)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 23 July 2007.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on UK Borders Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
694 c132GC Session
2006-07Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 12:48:51 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_413068
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_413068
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_413068