I think I know the case to which the noble Earl is referring. I believe that the person was charged with destruction of documents, which is a criminal offence that attracts a penalty of up to six months. It would be useful if the Government could declare that they do not wish people to be prosecuted for this offence when there is the slightest suspicion that they might have been victims of trafficking. It should be incorporated into instructions to the Crown Prosecution Service that, as a matter of public interest, which is one of the considerations that it has to take into account in deciding whether to prosecute, the question of whether a person may have been trafficked is a primary reason for not proceeding to prosecution.
UK Borders Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Avebury
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 23 July 2007.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on UK Borders Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
694 c126-7GC Session
2006-07Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 12:46:42 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_413058
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_413058
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_413058