UK Parliament / Open data

Concessionary Bus Travel Bill [Lords]

I am bound to disagree with the hon. Gentleman. When he hears the rest of my remarks, he will realise why we have chosen the two-year period. Several problems may occur in the transitional year. Indeed, the finance director of Nexus refers to a couple of years, during which there may be transitional problems. It is therefore right to conduct a review after two years. I repeat that the solution to the problem is to vote with us for the new clause. To finish in Tyne and Wear, the free off-peak local bus passes were introduced in April 2006, with the council paying for the travel within its boundaries. To pay for that, Nexus had to change 11 bus services, raise the cost of child fares and scrap plans for a teen travel card. Travel chiefs are warning that, unless funding is certain and correct for the 2008 scheme, similar cuts might have to be implemented. Only yesterday morning I received an e-mail from the new incoming Conservative administration of Carrick council in Cornwall. The concern there is exactly the same. The Carrick scheme this year is more generous than is necessary to satisfy the Government scheme. The e-mail states:"““Changing the scheme back to the minimum required standard will take some time and incur costs””," if the council chooses to take that route."““The net benefit in the current financial year is probably not worth the effort. The real problems begin next year with a change in the imposed national scheme.””" The national bus concessionary travel scheme will impose considerable financial problems on Carrick, particularly as it is an area with a high number of tourists. That could have a major impact on the council tax. Around the country, a number of councils are expressing concern about the adequacy of central Government funding to support the scheme that is being introduced.

About this proceeding contribution

Reference

462 c514-5 

Session

2006-07

Chamber / Committee

House of Commons chamber
Back to top