UK Parliament / Open data

Offender Management Bill

The noble Lord and the noble Baroness make important points. We need clarity in terms of criteria and I shall explain how that will be dealt with, but the process whereby chairs and probation board members were recently recruited will continue. That parity of treatment and the probity that we have will continue. The noble Baroness and the noble Lord know that we have to target the skills of those on the probation board to meet its needs, in the same way in which we will target the skills on the probation trust to meet its needs. That skills mix will be important. The process was nationally managed. Competence was based on application and interview. Board chairs were appointed by the national director via delegated authority from the Secretary of State, and board members by a similar process. However, the board chair made the appointment acting on behalf of the Secretary of State, and the same will go for trusts in future. The answer to the noble Baroness’s question is almost, ““Don’t worry””. The probity that we had before has to continue; nothing will be done on a little frolic of the chairman’s own with no appropriate criteria.

About this proceeding contribution

Reference

692 c1060-1 

Session

2006-07

Chamber / Committee

House of Lords chamber
Back to top