I, too, strongly support the amendment. It is some years since I raised this issue on behalf of some residents in Canada, who found it difficult to understand why the border should determine whether or not they received a pension. After all, they do not make reciprocal agreements—they have no power to do so—but it is iniquitous to reduce their pension year by year by allowing inflation to erode it. I cannot see the justice of that. The only further answer that I received, apart from that relating to reciprocity—and I listened carefully to the noble Baroness, Lady Turner—was, ““It is not one of our priorities””. I regret that that was not convincing to my correspondent in Canada. I hope that the Minister will say something better and more reassuring.
Pensions Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Dearing
(Crossbench)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 4 June 2007.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Pensions Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
692 c934-5 Session
2006-07Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 11:32:24 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_400374
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_400374
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_400374