I am extremely grateful to my noble friend Lord Fowler for his speech in response to my amendment. I was somewhat surprised by the last point that the Minister made. At Question Time today, the third Question was about the Olympics; the noble Lord was clearly jumping fences before he had arrived at them, which is probably a bad habit, certainly for a hurdler. Perhaps he has never been a hurdler; I do not know.
It is all very well having little dribs and drabs of information scattered in miscellaneous reports, but that is no substitute for collating them. I accept the Minister’s point about having such a report every five years, but I do not accept the fact that it is not needed because of the plethora of information that is already available and which he has committed himself to continuing to make available. I will consider whether to go further with the amendment. In the mean time, I beg leave to withdraw it.
Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.
Pensions Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Skelmersdale
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 4 June 2007.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Pensions Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
692 c929-30 Session
2006-07Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 11:24:06 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_400362
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_400362
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_400362