UK Parliament / Open data

Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Bill

I of course endorse everything that my hon. Friend the Member for North-East Bedfordshire (Alistair Burt) said, but I speak in support of amendment No. 259, in my name. It would delete clause 51 and the time limit for holding referendums. Clause 51 states:"““A local authority…in England may not hold more than one referendum in any period of ten years””." It also says that the clause"““applies to referendums held before, and referendums held after, this section comes into force.””" It seems to me that the clause has been put in specifically to deal with what might be described as the Doncaster problem. The elected mayor in Doncaster is very unpopular and has become a bit of a laughing stock. The residents of Doncaster have put together a petition, with the necessary signatures, to have a further referendum on whether to scrap the mayoral system in the area, much to the embarrassment, no doubt, of the Labour party in Doncaster and of the Government, who have tried so hard to push the mayoral system in this country. This clause appears to be a cynical attempt to prevent the good people of Doncaster from being able to get rid of their mayor. I hope that the Minister will be able to confirm—if he will not accept my amendment—that the people of Doncaster, who have gathered the thousands of names on the petition to get rid of the mayor—that has been endorsed by Doncaster council—will not be prevented from having a referendum to get rid of their unpopular mayor. I hope that the Minister will address that point when he winds up.

About this proceeding contribution

Reference

460 c1198-9 

Session

2006-07

Chamber / Committee

House of Commons chamber
Back to top