I hear what the Minister says. I presume that this amendment will not reappear now that it has been moved by the Government and will presumably be accepted. It is a pity, because we have not really discussed at any length the Government’s intention for that consultation. That is my fault.
I thank the Minister for her reply. The discussions she has offered will be helpful; it will be useful to see how these strategies are working. I have no doubt that what is being suggested is as it should be, but it would be very nice to see how the Mayor will do it. If I need to table the amendment again so that we can discuss it again, perhaps we can do it in a way which will be helpful as much as begging the questions. For today, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.
Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.
[Amendments Nos. 45 and 46 not moved.]
Clause 21 agreed to.
Clause 22 [The health inequalities strategy]:
[Amendments Nos. 47 to 53 not moved.]
Greater London Authority Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Hanham
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 2 May 2007.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Greater London Authority Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
691 c109GC Session
2006-07Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 12:50:27 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_394221
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_394221
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_394221