On a point not directly to do with this Bill, we have all at different times complained about the groupings. I remind myself and everybody else that we have perfect access to the groupings in advance, and we have a right to change them. If the groupings are not to our satisfaction it is our fault. I can tell the noble Lord, Lord Lester, that I felt the same way on Monday, but it was my fault for not having checked them. It would have helped had they been checked and grouped rather better.
I have one question before deciding on the merits of the noble Lord’s amendment. Why have the Government decided that a closed and finite list is necessary? I understand that the word ““means”” in this subsection, as opposed to the word ““includes””, means that it is a closed list, and that it is not relevant to anything anywhere else. I should be interested to know whether that is the case.
Justice and Security (Northern Ireland) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Glentoran
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 21 March 2007.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Justice and Security (Northern Ireland) Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
690 c201GC Session
2006-07Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 12:46:09 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_386807
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_386807
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_386807