The fact of the matter is that the word ““significant”” is there not to be helpful but to restrict; you will be able to make your case only if the change will be ““significant””. My argument was that all the things in Clause 5 are significant, and the Minister is therefore not answering my point.
Serious Crime Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Crickhowell
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 14 March 2007.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Serious Crime Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
690 c799 Session
2006-07Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 11:34:59 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_385226
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_385226
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_385226