moved AmendmentNo. 67:
67: Clause 9, page 7, line 2, leave out subsections (1) to (3)
The noble Lord said: We were promised by the noble Lord, Lord Bassam, that the debate on the next set of amendments would be long. However, although the point looks extremely complicated, it is in fact very simple.
It may have occurred to the Government that we are rather opposed to the idea of these serious crime prevention orders, especially when they are imposed by the High Court in the circumstances set out in the Bill. I have decided that I am not going to use the words ““house arrest”” any more, because the noble Baroness has—
Serious Crime Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Thomas of Gresford
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 14 March 2007.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Serious Crime Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
690 c790-1 Session
2006-07Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 12:38:25 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_385213
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_385213
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_385213