UK Parliament / Open data

Legal Services Bill [HL]

I am of course most grateful. I was interested to hear the noble Baroness use ““no evidence”” as one reason for not supporting this amendment. There are so many circumstances in the Bill when there has been no evidence of any potential danger to the consumer; nevertheless, the Government have felt obliged, or indeed have been determined, to regulate. I therefore hope that she will forgive me for not putting too much weight on that part of her response. It is clear that the Law Society has some evidence. If that is cogent evidence, not accepting this amendment would leave a substantial gap in the regulatory system for the Bill.

About this proceeding contribution

Reference

690 c173 

Session

2006-07

Chamber / Committee

House of Lords chamber
Back to top