UK Parliament / Open data

Offender Management Bill

Proceeding contribution from Lord Reid of Cardowan (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 28 February 2007. It occurred during Debate on bills on Offender Management Bill.
If my hon. Friend will let me go a little further, I will certainly give way to her in a moment. After discussing that matter and similar subjects with colleagues, I should like to say something about the importance of local representation and identity, not just accountability, on trust boards. That issue was raised by my hon. Friends the Members for Stockton, North (Frank Cook), for Blackpool, South (Mr. Marsden), for Sheffield, Attercliffe (Mr. Betts), for Wansbeck (Mr. Murphy) and for Bedford (Patrick Hall). I agree with them; I would expect board chairs to be drawn largely from local areas, and we would be happy to make that clear in the guidance that will follow on from the legislation. A number of colleagues have also raised the importance of local area agreements, which have already been discussed in the context of the Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Bill. They are important because they place obligations on a range of partners, including probation boards, to co-operate with local authorities in the preparation of local area agreements beneath regional level. I can confirm that this duty will also apply to probation trusts. Going one final step, I also want to consider how regional commissioners should be involved in local area agreements. At the moment, local probation boards participate in the local area agreement, but I want to ensure that the regional commissioner is also involved.

About this proceeding contribution

Reference

457 c1022 

Session

2006-07

Chamber / Committee

House of Commons chamber
Back to top