That leads me on to the issue that the hon. Member for Hornchurch raised about what we are doing to stop people giving addresses such as ““in the woods””. Although I have some concerns about ““in the woods”” being an address, the reason why that was done was that offenders had to tell people where they were and to say ““no fixed abode”” was not appropriate either. To make sure that people comply, in addition to what everybody accepts as the proper arrangements—involving the multi-agency public protection bodies that deal with high-risk offenders—we will also make it a requirement that the offenders have to report regularly to a police station. We will bring legislation forward to do that. This point relates to the question of why we have no central records. The issue is about the MAPPA—multi-agency public protection arrangements—authorities, of which there are 42, making sure that they know where their sex offenders are and making sure that they know the interfaces that take place when people move around. The big issue is about denial and the way in which child sex offenders operate.
Offender Management Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Gerry Sutcliffe
(Labour)
in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 28 February 2007.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Offender Management Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
457 c944 Session
2006-07Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 11:45:55 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_380715
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_380715
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_380715