I gave way and in a sense we have just had an intervention on an intervention. Perhaps I may now conclude my remarks and respond to the Minister. What the Minister is doing is basically finding a series of different excuses. We heard the same excuses made in the Commons for why no genuine independent report is possible. I do not accept what he says. The Commission for Equality and Human Rights would be a perfectly appropriate body to produce a report, but he may feel that it would not be prepared to do so. Perhaps between now and Report he could inquire about that—as, indeed, I could—and get back to me. We are just hearing a number of different reasons why the Government want to be judge and jury in their own case, and we do not accept that. With that, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.
Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.
Clause 8 agreed to.
Clause 9 [Limited capability for work-related activity]:
[Amendments Nos. 39 to 46 not moved.]
Welfare Reform Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Oakeshott of Seagrove Bay
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 28 February 2007.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Welfare Reform Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
689 c211GC Session
2006-07Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 12:48:29 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_380537
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_380537
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_380537