Sob stuff. It is one thing for this Minister, for regulation reform, to say that he will keep this under personal review for the next two years. Can the Minister extend that a fraction further and say that ““any”” Minister for welfare reform will continue that process for two years? Clearly, Amendment No. 92 was never meant to cover all 400-plus regulations. It was intended to cover only those made specifically under this part. It seems as though I shall have to look at the drafting again to get my point more clearly across. I assure the Minister that I will return to this matter in one form or another once I have decided how to achieve it. In the mean time, when the time comes I will not move Amendment No. 92.
Welfare Reform Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Skelmersdale
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 28 February 2007.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Welfare Reform Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
689 c209GC Session
2006-07Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 12:46:17 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_380527
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_380527
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_380527