I support my noble friend. I ask the Minister why the word ““prejudiced”” has been chosen, particularly as I feel that my noble friend's alternative of ““improperly constrained or influenced”” really meets the circumstances that the Government envisage here. ““Prejudiced”” is a much wider and stronger word. It would be helpful to know why that word has been chosen. I hope that the Minister agrees with my noble friend’s amendment.
Legal Services Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Hunt of Wirral
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 22 January 2007.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Legal Services Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
688 c975 Session
2006-07Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 11:16:42 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_371738
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_371738
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_371738